.
Feedback

Proposed County Measure Would Tax for Stormwater Clean Up Projects

County property owners recently received mailers on a proposed tax measure to cover costs for improving water quality and reducing pollution.

The Clean Water, Clean Beaches Measure creates a pool of money for stormwater clean up projects by taxing county property owners.

Click here for the tax proposal ballot.

Property owners should have received notification in their mail boxes by with how much their annual tax would be by now.

A typical single-family homeowner would pay about $54 on average and condominium owners $20 or less, according to Phil Doudar, project manager for the initiative. About 90 percent of parcel owners would likely pay less than $100, though large commercial property owners could pay thousands of dollars.

If approved, property owners would be charged an annual fee to cover costs associated with improving water quality and reducing pollution from urban runoff.

Department of Public Works Director Gail Farber warned earlier this year that county waterways are choked with trash, infection-causing bacteria, toxic chemicals, lead, copper and other metals, oil and grease.

As proposed, the measure would raise about $276 million annually to be split between Los Angeles County's Flood Control District, nine watershed areas set up to manage cleanup projects and the rest of the cities that make up the county.

The Flood Control District spent an estimated $340 million to control pollutants in fiscal year 2010-11, according to Farber, who has estimated the cost of complying with existing water-quality regulations to be in the billions of dollars.

But supervisors Michael Antonovich and Don Knabe objected to what they called a tax on residents, saying funding should come from the federal or state government.

Antonovich and Knabe voted against the proposal in July, arguing that it should be put to voters in a future election rather than to property owners via a mail-in ballot.

"It really is disingenuous,'' Knabe said. "Clearly the intent of  this piece of mail is to look like junk mail.''

Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, who backs the measure disagreed, saying it looks much like rate increase notices from local utilities.

Environmental groups, as well as representatives of the City's Department of Engineering also back the proposal, saying it will create funding for local projects that can also prevent flooding and recycle water.

The notice is just the first step in the approval process.

A public hearing on the matter is scheduled for Jan. 15 during the board's regular weekly meeting at 9:30 a.m.

If a majority of property owners protest the fee in writing before the end of that meeting, the fee will not be imposed.

If a majority do not object, a ballot would be mailed to property owners. And if a majority of ballots returned are in favor of the measure, the fee would be charged.

More information is available at www.lacountycleanwater.org.

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Diamond Bar-Walnut Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Greg Hummel May 22, 2013 at 03:02 pm
Oops, the LABGS meets, in general, the fourth Thursday every month!
Melanie C. Johnson (Editor) May 22, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Congratulations Mr. Rodgers!
Michael W May 19, 2013 at 04:04 pm
I wasn't talking about that, when did that happen, '73? Richard Nixon? That was a colossal waste ofRead More money. Nixon also started the EPA. Not many realize what a worthless Liberal he really was. He also took us off the Gold Standard which was the genesis for out of control gov spending.
joebanana May 19, 2013 at 01:13 pm
How many people in wheelchairs, or blind people walking around have you ever seen in Walnut? I'veRead More lived here since 1968, I haven't seen one, not a single one. I have nothing against the handicapped, I do have a problem with the money it costs to jackhammer up sidewalks, and put ramps that nobody needs, especially 5 feet from a driveway aprin.
Melanie C. Johnson (Editor) May 18, 2013 at 10:32 am
Oh wow.
pamylla May 16, 2013 at 05:23 pm
Why am I just reading this TODAY (May 16th) when the deadline was in April? Too late to do anythingRead More about it now...
Vito Spago April 13, 2013 at 03:48 pm
How about Hillary's failures: 1) Bill cheated on her 2) She was beat out for President by a Negro.Read More That is sure to "get" southern crackers like the Clintons, no matter how liberal they are. 3) Through incompetence, she is responsible for the deaths in Benghazi and covered it up.
Michael W April 13, 2013 at 01:45 pm
You are so cynical, Hillary is awesome! She enabled the North Koreans to test a nuclear bomb withoutRead More consequences, turned Egypt into a hostile nation supporting the Moslem Brotherhood, supported the overthrow of Khadaffy in Libya, which is a paradise of Democracy now- take a romantic tour of Benghazi to prove it. Your nasty comments might bring on another fainting spell! "I declare, can a gentlemen get a lady a lemonade and a parasol"
Richard Dobiesz April 13, 2013 at 12:45 pm
Can anyone name even one of Hillary's accomplishments in the last four years? Other than maybe theRead More Benghazi debacle.
CDB April 1, 2013 at 03:00 am
Way to go DB Ballers!
Lori Liebe March 31, 2013 at 05:24 pm
Awesome! Congrats to Everyone!
Desiree Thomas March 31, 2013 at 02:51 pm
That's GREAT news! Congratulations All Stars!!