.

Oil Money Could Fund Mt. SAC and Cal Poly

The proposed legislation would charge a severance tax on crude produced in California and its coastal waters.

Sen. Noreen Evans, D-Santa Rosa, this week introduced legislation that, if passed, would generate an estimated $2 billion in annual revenue for state schools and parks. Evans co-authored the bill, SB 241, with the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, Mark Leno. 

The measure would send 93 percent of the money raised to the University of California, Cal State and the community college system with the remaining 7 percent going to fund state parks. 

“California is the largest—and only—oil producing state in the nation that does not tax its vast oil resources,” wrote Evans in a press release. “Those are unrealized revenues we can, and should, use to endow our core services of government by fulfilling our commitment to higher education and similarly, preserve our natural resources in State Parks by funding them.” 

According to a CNN Money, California’s Monterey Shale is estimated to hold 400 billion barrels of oil, but only about 15 billion barrels are recoverable using today’s technology including hydraulic fracturing. 

The amount raised by the proposed severance tax would depend on the world price of oil, according to Teala Schaff, a spokesperson for Senator Evans.  According to Schaff, the State Board of Equalization estimates that at current prices and production levels the tax will raise about $2 billion a year. 

This isn’t the first time an oil tax has been proposed. In 2006, California voters rejected an oil severance tax that would have funded alternative energy programs throughout the state. The fight over Proposition 87 was a costly one, with proponents spending $62 million, while opponents, including California-based oil companies Chevron and Occidental Petroleum, spent $94 million.

North Dakota, site of the country’s latest oil production boom charges an 11.5 percent oil severance tax for oil produced from the Bakken Shale in the western part of the state.

What do you think? Should Mt. SAC and Cal Poly Pomona be funded using oil severance taxes especially when the oil is recovered using hydraulic fracturing?

Do you subscribe to the Diamond Bar-Walnut newsletter? It brings our latest stories, blogs, announcements and the day's calendar events to your in-box early each morning. Follow Diamond Bar-Walnut Patch on Facebook and Twitter.

If there’s something in this article you think should be corrected, or if something else is amiss email the editor at diamondbar@patch.com.

Michael February 15, 2013 at 12:14 AM
These taxes will be paid by YOU after all the oil corporations pass the cost on to you- which they WILL do. CA gasoline is already a dollar more than Nevada, what will make Democrats happy, $6.00 a gallon gas? That will be great for your budget.
Rosalie Stafford February 15, 2013 at 03:42 PM
Dems want "little people" to take bullet trains to the neighborhood organic grocery store
Greg Hummel February 15, 2013 at 04:16 PM
At what cost of jobs? This is a stupid idea. Instead of taxing "the rich" oil companies, how about we hold our legislators accountable and demand they stop robbing the proposition mandated funding to help pay for their idiotic handling of the general budget?
Greg Hummel February 15, 2013 at 04:19 PM
And, the state already reaps millions of dollars per year in royalties. They want to tax the oil being extracted from PRIVATE property, yet make it sound like this resource is part of the public domain.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »